Law of Large Number and Central Limit Theorem under Uncertainty, the related New Itô's Calculus and Applications to Risk Measures
Let
where
is a sequence of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) of random variables with
. According to the classical law of large number (LLN), the sum
converges strongly to
. Moreover, the well-known central limit theorem (CLT) tells us that, with
and
, for each bounded and continuous function
we have
with
.
These two fundamentally important results are widely used in probability, statistics, data analysis as well as in many practical situation such as financial pricing and risk controls. They provide a strong argument to explain why in practice normal distributions are so widely used. But a serious problem is that the i.i.d. condition is very difficult to be satisfied in practice for the most real-time processes for which the classical trials and samplings becomes impossible and the uncertainty of probabilities and/or distributions cannot be neglected.
In this talk we present a systematical generalization of the above LLN and CLT. Instead of fixing a probability measure P, we only assume that there exists a uncertain subset of probability measures
. In this case a robust way to calculate the expectation of a financial loss
is its upper expectation:
where
is the expectation under the probability
. The corresponding distribution uncertainty of
is given by
,
. Our main assumptions are:
- The distributions of
are within an abstract subset of distributions
, called the distribution uncertainty of
, with
and
. - Any realization of
does not change the distributional uncertainty of
(a new type of `independence' ).
Our new LLN is: for each linear growth continuous function
we have
![]() |
Namely, the distribution uncertainty of
is, approximately,
.
In particular, if
, then
converges strongly to 0. In this case, if we assume furthermore that
and
,
. Then we have the following generalization of the CLT:
![]() |
Here
stands for a distribution uncertainty subset and
its the corresponding upper expectation. The number
can be calculated by defining
which solves the following PDE
, with ]^2a^+-s^2a^-). $](/sites/default/files/tex/9fad4a373e7462a8899e31fa53f44ba522473288.png)
An interesting situation is when
is a convex function,
with
. But if
is a concave function, then the above
has to be replaced by
. This coincidence can be used to explain a well-known puzzle: many practitioners, particularly in finance, use normal distributions with `dirty' data, and often with successes. In fact, this is also a high risky operation if the reasoning is not fully understood. If
, then
which is a classical normal distribution. The method of the proof is very different from the classical one and a very deep regularity estimate of fully nonlinear PDE plays a crucial role.
A type of combination of LLN and CLT which converges in law to a more general
-distributions have been obtained. We also present our systematical research on the continuous-time counterpart of the above `G-normal distribution', called G-Brownian motion and the corresponding stochastic calculus of Itô's type as well as its applications.
You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.


![$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \^{\mathbf{E}}[j(S_n/n)] = \sup_{m\leq v\leq ['(m)]} j(v)$$](/sites/default/files/tex/0106d3f1cbb9ee762ee3c9c8681c5af767dc2ad0.png)
![$$\lim_{n\to\infty} [j(Sn/\sqrt{n})]= \^{\mathbf{E}}[j(X)], L(X)\in N(0,[s^2,\overline{s}^2]).$$](/sites/default/files/tex/d54fdc485d28650ff50dfac23f14ea2cd178066d.png)







































































































